Asus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive75.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory59.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120410
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateOct 18 '20 at 22:07
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3930K-$195
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Memory 85.2
1-Core 87.1
2-Core 178
68% 117 Pts
4-Core 362
8-Core 542
56% 452 Pts
64-Core 632
39% 632 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
PNY(196E 119E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
104% Outstanding
Lighting 134
Reflection 146
Parallax 137
109% 139 fps
MRender 116
Gravity 132
Splatting 109
96% 119 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 104%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
519GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 322 323 323 311 309 308 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
75.2% Very good
Read 350
Write 319
Mixed 307
SusWrite 316
73% 323 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 45.9
4K Mixed 31.5
103% 34.2 MB/s
DQ Read 250
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 211
160% 217 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 133%
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199
352GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 244 244 235 233 233 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
64.5% Good
Read 254
Write 142
Mixed 172
SusWrite 236
45% 201 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 46.9
4K Mixed 30.2
102% 34.3 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 158
DQ Mixed 159
125% 174 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 126%
OCZ REVODRIVE3 MI X2 480GB
446GB free
Firmware: 2.15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 471 479 475 467 470 472 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
WD Elements 2620 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 2620
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 100 100 100 101 99 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
52.7% Above average
Read 112
Write 98.5
Mixed 64.2
SusWrite 99.9
124% 93.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.7
187% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 2133 C9 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
80% Excellent
MC Read 32.3
MC Write 31.3
MC Mixed 29.3
88% 31 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 11.4
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 80%
This bench: 80%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE IV EXTREME Builds (Compare 1,590 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME - $589

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $1,078
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback