Acer Aspire A315-42G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 13%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 8.27%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics2.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire A315-42G  (all builds)
MotherboardPK Sleepy_PK
Memory6 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200601
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 16 '20 at 21:15
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 0.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
8.27% Terrible
Memory 9.78
1-Core 11.8
2-Core 21.3
8% 14.3 Pts
4-Core 36.5
8-Core 66.7
6% 51.6 Pts
64-Core 66.1
4% 66.1 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 8.27%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Graphics
Acer(1025 134D) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.10.28.10
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.62% Terrible
Lighting 3.17
Reflection 2.88
Parallax 4.31
3% 3.45 fps
MRender 2.95
Gravity 3.37
Splatting 3.43
3% 3.25 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 2.62%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFM512GDJTNG-8310A 512GB
435GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80002C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 242 253 240 256 240 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40.1% Average
Read 252
Write 219
Mixed 223
SusWrite 242
53% 234 MB/s
4K Read 11.5
4K Write 12.1
4K Mixed 11.2
38% 11.6 MB/s
DQ Read 90.4
DQ Write 62.1
DQ Mixed 68.9
53% 73.8 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 172%
VBTM Store'n'go 1GB
1GB free, PID 0020
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 5 5 5.1 4.9 5 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
3.47% Terrible
Read 11.2
Write 4.7
Mixed 4
SusWrite 4.7
7% 6.15 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
16% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.47%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SMS4TDC3C0K0446SCG Adata AM1P26KC8T1-BAAS 12GB
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
16.9% Very poor
MC Read 5
MC Write 5
MC Mixed 9.5
19% 6.5 GB/s
SC Read 2.5
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 2.2
9% 3.1 GB/s
Latency 406
10% 406 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire A315-42G Builds (Compare 206 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A315-42G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback