Gigabyte GA-B250-HD3P-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 37% Jet ski	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 30% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	36.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	52% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	Gigabyte B250-HD3P
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-B250-HD3P-CF (all builds)
Memory	5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1280x1024x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170407
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 16 '17 at 11:37
Run Duration	356 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7400-$95 234,266 User benchmarks, average bench 64% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	83.4% Excellent	Memory 93.7 1-Core 110 2-Core 217 81% 140 Pts	4-Core 423 8-Core 427 57% 425 Pts	64-Core 428 26% 428 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 83.4% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3733) CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 378.78 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	36.2% Below average	Lighting 47 Reflection 31.8 Parallax 39.1 38% 39.3 fps	MRender 39.1 Gravity 42.1 Splatting 36.9 32% 39.4 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 36.2% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160 11,403 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 88GB free (System drive) Firmware: 580ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 8627789395 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 -54193897335206 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1041 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 206 (B1) Unknown 0 0 98 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 32 45 55837524000 (C2) HDA temperature 32 45 55837524000 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 108 108 8627789395 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 108 108 8627789395 (CC) Soft ECC correction 108 108 8627789395 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 97 97 1 (E9) Unknown 0 0 10077 (EA) Unknown 0 0 5980 (F1) Unknown 0 0 5980 (F2) Unknown 0 0 14227	52% Above average	Read 426 Write 105 Mixed 147 49% 226 MB/s	4K Read 18.3 4K Write 90.2 4K Mixed 11.5 90% 40 MB/s	DQ Read 22.3 DQ Write 96.7 DQ Mixed 9.27 22% 42.7 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 52% Great: 75%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2TB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 140 140 69 (03) Spinup time 147 147 34387722595 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 2417 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2334 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 418 (C0) Power-off retract count 98 98 2417 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 2417 (C2) HDA temperature 176 176 188980133922 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	100% Outstanding	Read 183 Write 166 Mixed 161 128% 170 MB/s	4K Read 1.09 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.21 106% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 107%
Samsung HD321KJ 320GB-$42 12,070 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 96GB free Firmware: CP100-10 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 253 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 5184 (04) Start/Stop count 88 88 12133 (05) Reallocated sector count 253 253 0 (07) Seek error rate 253 253 0 (08) Seek timer performance 253 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 14551 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 253 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4887 (BB) vendor-specific 253 253 0 (BC) Unknown 253 253 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 58 33 (C2) HDA temperature 139 112 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 163444 (C4) Reallocation count 253 253 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 253 253 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 253 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 253 253 0	38.2% Below average	Read 64.1 Write 69 Mixed 63.5 49% 65.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.53 4K Write 1.14 4K Mixed 0.3 77% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 38.2% Great: 43%
WD Elements 1TB 51,914 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 140GB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	18.4% Very poor	Read 34.4 Write 33.9 Mixed 33.9 44% 34.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.65 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.37 80% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 18.4% Great: 43%
Kingston DataTraveler 101 G2 USB 2.0 4GB-$15 1,780 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 1GB free, PID 1642 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	6.5% Terrible	Read 23.4 Write 6.85 Mixed 10.2 14% 13.5 MB/s	4K Read 6.33 4K Write 0.04 4K Mixed 0.08 28% 2.15 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.5% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C15 2x4GB 38,955 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	82.7% Excellent	MC Read 30.5 MC Write 33 MC Mixed 24.4 84% 29.3 GB/s	SC Read 18 SC Write 32.2 SC Mixed 23.5 70% 24.6 GB/s	Latency 60.5 66% 60.5 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 82.7% Great: 91%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-B250-HD3P-CF Builds (Compare 833 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 34%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B250-HD3P-CF

CPU
Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples	194x
Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	123x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	102x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	140x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	108x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	96x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	38x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	35x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $75Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	20x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 76%, 105,447 samples	28x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	18x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 73%, 66,222 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 102% - Outstanding

Total price: $275

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16