Asrock A300M-STX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics13.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive39.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock A300M-STX  (all builds)
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191028
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateOct 14 '20 at 14:35
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User QAT-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$75
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
59.6% Above average
Memory 39.1
1-Core 79.7
2-Core 203
54% 107 Pts
4-Core 459
8-Core 460
62% 459 Pts
64-Core 455
28% 455 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
AMD(1002 15D8) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.10.16
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Lighting 16.8
Reflection 16.7
Parallax 20.9
14% 18.2 fps
MRender 13
Gravity 16.7
Splatting 21.2
14% 17 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE300000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 62 62 61 62 61 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Read 401
Write 74.5
Mixed 132
SusWrite 57.8
36% 166 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 15.3
4K Mixed 15.9
53% 15.9 MB/s
DQ Read 107
DQ Write 50.6
DQ Mixed 1.4
22% 52.9 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 53%
WD WD5000LUCT-63C26Y0 500GB
454GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 107 108 107 107 104 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
60.3% Good
Read 104
Write 96.3
Mixed 51
SusWrite 106
65% 89.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G3B2 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
79.9% Very good
MC Read 30.4
MC Write 31.9
MC Mixed 28.5
86% 30.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.8
SC Write 25.5
SC Mixed 21.4
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 207
19% 207 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A300M-STX Builds (Compare 162 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A300M-STX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $99
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback