bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics51.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Motherboard X99-D3
Memory24.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191031
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 07 '20 at 15:03
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
71.6% Very good
Memory 81.1
1-Core 91.9
2-Core 178
68% 117 Pts
4-Core 335
8-Core 571
55% 453 Pts
64-Core 726
45% 726 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.6% Above average
Lighting 63
Reflection 67.7
Parallax 85.6
51% 72.1 fps
MRender 69.9
Gravity 65.1
Splatting 58.1
52% 64.3 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingchuxing 1TB 1TB
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 911XKR
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1423
Write 1,501
Mixed 1,030
294% 1,318 MB/s
4K Read 41.5
4K Write 131
4K Mixed 32.9
174% 68.5 MB/s
DQ Read 763
DQ Write 104
DQ Mixed 237
223% 368 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 228%
Hitachi HTS545050B9A300 500GB-$68
4GB free
Firmware: C66G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 9.4 12 11 11 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Read 34.8
Write 13.5
Mixed 15.3
SusWrite 11
14% 18.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
104% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 45%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
487GB free
Firmware: MM6OA5C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 96 97 101 103 102 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Read 107
Write 96.5
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 99.1
67% 91.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 108%
Hitachi HTS547564A9E384 640GB
40GB free
Firmware: JEDOA50A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 62 62 62 62 63 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
31.5% Below average
Read 48.8
Write 48.8
Mixed 31
SusWrite 61
35% 47.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
95% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G3B2 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
56.7% Above average
MC Read 22.6
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 18.2
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 16.4
44% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 78.5
51% 78.5 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,497 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback