| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
| System | DELL Studio XPS 435T/9000 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | DELL 0X501H |
| Memory | 14.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20090728 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 12 '20 at 23:51 |
| Run Duration | 216 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 33% |
PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon X5690
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.45 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
|
75.5%
Very good
|
69% 117 Pts
|
53% 426 Pts
|
39% 624 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Gigabyte(1458 362D) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.55
|
17.6%
Very poor
|
18% 19.3 fps
|
17% 21.3 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
307GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 668 260 257 259 261 260 MB/s
|
||||
|
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$90
3.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 174 174 174 173 173 MB/s
|
100%
Outstanding
|
108% 148 MB/s
|
218% 1.67 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 6x4GB
6 of 6 slots used
24GB DIMM
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
42.4%
Average
|
42% 14.8 GB/s
|
28% 9.9 GB/s
|
58% 68.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Studio XPS 435T/9000 Builds (Compare 463 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: DELL Studio XPS 435T/9000
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples | 319x |
| Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples | 20x |
| Xeon X5690IntelBench 75%, 4,873 samples | 16x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 38x |
| GTX 260Nvidia $250Bench 7%, 11,945 samples | 20x |
| GeForce GT 220NvidiaBench 2%, 19,671 samples | 16x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 85% - Excellent | Total price: $177 |