Gigabyte GA-H310M S2

Performance Results


Gaming 106% UFO	Desktop 96% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 107% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	110% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	89.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H310M S2 (all builds)
Memory	11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190605
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Oct 12 '20 at 19:38
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	8%

Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$403 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	96% Outstanding	Memory 93 1-Core 142 2-Core 284 95% 173 Pts	4-Core 531 8-Core 1,058 94% 794 Pts	64-Core 1,417 88% 1,417 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 96% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200 478,117 User benchmarks, average bench 104% EVGA(3842 1071) CLim: 2250 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	110% Outstanding	Lighting 142 Reflection 124 Parallax 106 115% 124 fps	MRender 184 Gravity 135 Splatting 91 107% 137 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 112%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9SB8W256G1122 256GB 445 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 101GB free (System drive) Firmware: X6107000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 112 96 93 97 76 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	89.1% Excellent	Read 492 Write 435 Mixed 238 SusWrite 109 71% 319 MB/s	4K Read 35.8 4K Write 83.7 4K Mixed 45.4 157% 55 MB/s	DQ Read 351 DQ Write 284 DQ Mixed 254 207% 296 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 89.1% Great: 105%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 1.5TB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 161 166 167 168 168 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	82.8% Excellent	Read 123 Write 128 Mixed 21.7 SusWrite 165 79% 109 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 156% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 82.8% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston CBD24D4U7S8MA-8 2x8GB 132 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	72.2% Very good	MC Read 28.7 MC Write 26.7 MC Mixed 20 72% 25.1 GB/s	SC Read 17.3 SC Write 28.1 SC Mixed 22.3 64% 22.6 GB/s	Latency 62.1 64% 62.1 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 72.2% Great: 83%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H310M S2 Builds (Compare 530 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 27%

Raft

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 23%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M S2

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	151x
Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples	99x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	59x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	62x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	44x
UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i3)IntelBench 5%, 32,403 samples	39x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	42x
BX500 240GBCrucial $28Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	25x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	18x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	18x
M378A1K43CB2-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 39%, 22,600 samples	10x
CBD24D4U7S8MA-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 74%, 132 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 101% - Outstanding

Total price: $185

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16