Gigabyte GA-H310M S2

Performance Results


Gaming 89% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 91% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	98.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	90.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H310M S2 (all builds)
Memory	12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190605
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 02 '20 at 20:12
Run Duration	123 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	6%

Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$410 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	89.4% Excellent	Memory 91.2 1-Core 143 2-Core 266 93% 167 Pts	4-Core 469 8-Core 1,002 86% 736 Pts	64-Core 1,365 84% 1,365 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 89.4% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200 478,117 User benchmarks, average bench 104% EVGA(3842 1071) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.55 Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	98.9% Outstanding	Lighting 138 Reflection 129 Parallax 136 112% 134 fps	MRender 180 Gravity 129 Splatting 0.13 73% 103 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 98.9% Great: 112%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9SB8W256G1122 256GB 445 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 109GB free (System drive) Firmware: X6107000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 187 164 170 190 166 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	90.7% Outstanding	Read 492 Write 456 Mixed 229 SusWrite 179 76% 339 MB/s	4K Read 36.6 4K Write 90.6 4K Mixed 36.6 150% 54.6 MB/s	DQ Read 367 DQ Write 283 DQ Mixed 228 197% 293 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 90.7% Great: 105%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 1.5TB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 87 106 105 106 112 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	38.1% Below average	Read 32.4 Write 59.6 Mixed 18.2 SusWrite 100 38% 52.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.1 41% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 38.1% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston CBD24D4U7S8MA-8 2x8GB 132 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	66.5% Good	MC Read 26.2 MC Write 23.6 MC Mixed 19.4 66% 23.1 GB/s	SC Read 17.5 SC Write 25.2 SC Mixed 20.1 60% 20.9 GB/s	Latency 65.4 61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 66.5% Great: 83%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H310M S2 Builds (Compare 527 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 27%

Raft

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 23%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M S2

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	150x
Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples	99x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	59x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	62x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	44x
UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i3)IntelBench 5%, 32,403 samples	38x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	42x
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	25x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	18x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	18x
M378A1K43CB2-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 39%, 22,600 samples	10x
CBD24D4U7S8MA-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 74%, 132 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 100% - Outstanding

Total price: $189

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16