Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics130% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive77% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory6.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190506
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateOct 12 '20 at 04:00
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$175
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Memory 77
1-Core 121
2-Core 242
80% 146 Pts
4-Core 451
8-Core 712
72% 581 Pts
64-Core 932
58% 932 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$700
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
130% Outstanding
Lighting 159
Reflection 198
Parallax 235
130% 197 fps
MRender 265
Gravity 201
Splatting 123
152% 196 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 130%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 480GB
330GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 386 133 221 45 104 19 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
77% Very good
Read 402
Write 115
Mixed 240
SusWrite 151
50% 227 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 71.1
4K Mixed 34
129% 45.6 MB/s
DQ Read 248
DQ Write 298
DQ Mixed 200
171% 249 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 77%
Great: 98%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$25
370GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 107 110 108 109 109 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
63.7% Good
Read 113
Write 106
Mixed 72.9
SusWrite 109
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 69%
WD WD120EMAZ-11BLFA0 12TB
4TB free
Firmware: 81.00A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 172 179 179 181 179 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 54% Great: 114%
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB
329GB free
Firmware: 0711
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 32 32 32 32 32 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Read 31
Write 30.7
Mixed 28
SusWrite 31.9
22% 30.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 6.2
4K Mixed 1
255% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 104%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABD100 1TB
59GB free, PID 0c25
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 39 38 39 39 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
18.9% Very poor
Read 37.4
Write 38.4
Mixed 25
SusWrite 38.8
47% 34.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.7% Very good
MC Read 28.4
MC Write 25.8
MC Mixed 25.9
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 19.6
SC Write 21.8
SC Mixed 22.1
60% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 86.4
46% 86.4 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,667 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $138

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $649
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback