Asrock Z97 Killer

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics50.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive94.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock Z97 Killer  (all builds)
Memory19 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160513
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateApr 14 '17 at 21:57
Run Duration287 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
74.8% Very good
Memory 86.2
1-Core 112
2-Core 216
79% 138 Pts
4-Core 346
8-Core 476
52% 411 Pts
64-Core 519
32% 519 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 381.65
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.2% Above average
Lighting 62
Reflection 67.9
Parallax 65.8
50% 65.2 fps
MRender 72.8
Gravity 58.1
Splatting 54.5
50% 61.8 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
398GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 512
Write 411
Mixed 420
100% 448 MB/s
4K Read 46.2
4K Write 89.9
4K Mixed 45.1
175% 60.4 MB/s
DQ Read 47.3
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 110
94% 132 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 105%
Great: 134%
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 500GB
263GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT21B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 403
Mixed 413
98% 442 MB/s
4K Read 43.3
4K Write 87.5
4K Mixed 27.5
147% 52.8 MB/s
DQ Read 45
DQ Write 214
DQ Mixed 26.5
50% 95.1 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 131%
Qnap iSCSI Storage 1TB
108GB free
Firmware: 4.0
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
26.4% Poor
Read 109
Write 110
Mixed 108
24% 109 MB/s
4K Read 14.7
4K Write 14.1
4K Mixed 11.6
45% 13.5 MB/s
DQ Read 32.6
DQ Write 43.6
DQ Mixed 23.5
22% 33.2 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 71%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49
608GB free
Firmware: CC54 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
74.9% Very good
Read 128
Write 133
Mixed 119
95% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.69
4K Write 1.59
4K Mixed 0.23
84% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 96%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
226GB free
Firmware: CC38 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
49.8% Average
Read 92.8
Write 80.7
Mixed 78.3
63% 83.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 1.32
4K Mixed 0.35
84% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 68%
ST2000DX 002-2DV164 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.1% Below average
Read 42.5
Write 42.8
Mixed 33.2
50% 39.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.71
4K Write 5.34
4K Mixed 0.69
208% 2.24 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 31%
WDC WD20 EURS-63S48Y0 2TB
233GB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
19.3% Very poor
Read 39.4
Write 37.8
Mixed 37.2
49% 38.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 1.72
4K Mixed 0.15
65% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
48.9% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 15.1
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 15.7
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 71.1
56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97 Killer Builds (Compare 1,149 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock Z97 Killer - $158

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $805
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback