Asus B85M-G R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive90.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus B85M-G R2.0  (all builds)
Memory9.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141027
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 14 '17 at 19:15
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G3220-$36
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Memory 87.8
1-Core 86.8
2-Core 164
68% 113 Pts
4-Core 170
8-Core 172
23% 171 Pts
64-Core 173
11% 173 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz)
Asus(1043 8534) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.98% Terrible
Lighting 2.13
Reflection 3.69
Parallax 3.28
2% 3.04 fps
MRender 3.71
Gravity 1.13
Splatting 3.87
2% 2.91 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.98%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 409
Mixed 416
98% 441 MB/s
4K Read 41.6
4K Write 89.8
4K Mixed 25.1
143% 52.1 MB/s
DQ Read 46.3
DQ Write 116
DQ Mixed 24.6
35% 62.4 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 115%
Crucial M4 64GB-$92
27GB free
Firmware: 0309 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 508
Write 108
Mixed 178
57% 265 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 72.7
4K Mixed 6.97
88% 35.5 MB/s
DQ Read 136
DQ Write 81
DQ Mixed 9.71
34% 75.5 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMX8GX3M2A1600C9 0215 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 0215 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 12GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.3% Below average
MC Read 11.1
MC Write 11.8
MC Mixed 9.2
31% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 9.9
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 69.7
57% 69.7 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B85M-G R2.0 Builds (Compare 808 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus B85M-G R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $178
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback