Acer Aspire TC-780

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.64% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive65.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire TC-780  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire TC-780(KBL)
Memory4.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170526
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateOct 09 '20 at 15:21
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$91
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
72.1% Very good
Memory 80.8
1-Core 91.7
2-Core 189
69% 120 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 382
50% 373 Pts
64-Core 384
24% 384 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Acer(1025 108E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4526
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
5.64% Terrible
Lighting 5.93
Reflection 9.19
Parallax 5.72
5% 6.95 fps
MRender 6.38
Gravity 5
Splatting 13.1
7% 8.17 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.64%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY SSD2SC240G1CS1754D117-820 240GB
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS111101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 260 179 84 77 74 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
65.7% Good
Read 367
Write 282
Mixed 250
SusWrite 121
57% 255 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 68.6
4K Mixed 27.7
106% 39.5 MB/s
DQ Read 260
DQ Write 246
DQ Mixed 172
152% 226 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 87%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40
246GB free
Firmware: MX4OABS0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 149 149 149 149 148 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Read 143
Write 138
Mixed 29.9
SusWrite 148
83% 115 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
180% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 108%
Seagate ST3750528AS 750GB-$65
526GB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 92 93 93 93 93 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
58% Above average
Read 110
Write 107
Mixed 59.6
SusWrite 92.3
68% 92.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1
170% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 58%
Great: 65%
Maxtor OneTouch 1TB
881GB free, PID 7300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 42 41 42 41 40 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
20.6% Poor
Read 40.4
Write 40.1
Mixed 29.6
SusWrite 41.2
51% 37.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
98% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 20.6%
Great: 21%
WD easystore 25FB 10TB
6TB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 37 37 37 37 36 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
28% Poor
Read 38.3
Write 36.4
Mixed 32.4
SusWrite 36.6
49% 35.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 1
196% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 28%
Great: 99%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 3.0 32GB
18GB free, PID 5597
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.3 13 13 14 15 13 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
22.9% Poor
Read 90.2
Write 29.3
Mixed 30.5
SusWrite 12.8
44% 40.7 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 2.9
182% 3.3 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 27%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AM2P24HC4U1-B9QS Kingston ACR24D4U7S8MB-8 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.4% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 15.5
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 7.8
25% 8.6 GB/s
Latency 79.1
51% 79.1 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire TC-780 Builds (Compare 1,591 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire TC-780

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $91
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback