Asrock X370 Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics34.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive87.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock X370 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170316
Uptime5.3 Days
Run DateApr 13 '17 at 19:26
Run Duration229 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
69.8% Good
Memory 67.5
1-Core 98.1
2-Core 196
67% 121 Pts
4-Core 386
8-Core 717
66% 552 Pts
64-Core 1,036
64% 1,036 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200
CLim: 990 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.4.1
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
34.7% Below average
Lighting 43.7
Reflection 48.7
Parallax 52.3
36% 48.2 fps
MRender 48.5
Gravity 38.3
Splatting 36.3
33% 41 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 239GB
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 8.1
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Read 1,092
Write 231
Mixed 224
111% 516 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 46.2
4K Mixed 9.73
70% 25.9 MB/s
DQ Read 191
DQ Write 234
DQ Mixed 9.87
64% 145 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 99%
Amd-raid SanDisk Ultra II 960GB
6GB free
Firmware: X412
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
71.7% Very good
Read 420
Write 290
Mixed 284
73% 331 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 50.4
4K Mixed 22.2
86% 31.1 MB/s
DQ Read 234
DQ Write 257
DQ Mixed 33.9
84% 175 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 72%
Amd-raid WDC WD5000AAKS-6 500GB
29GB free
Firmware: 01.0
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
37.2% Below average
Read 61.8
Write 67.3
Mixed 65.4
49% 64.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 2.35
4K Mixed 0.4
108% 1.08 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 49%
Amd-raid ST3750528AS 750GB
6GB free
Firmware: HP22
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
24.2% Poor
Read 49.3
Write 34.8
Mixed 28.8
28% 37.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.32
67% 0.51 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 57%
WD 5000AAJ External 500GB
99GB free, PID 1100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
17.4% Very poor
Read 32.2
Write 33.5
Mixed 18.9
35% 28.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.61
4K Write 1.73
4K Mixed 0.35
73% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$34
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
64.3% Good
MC Read 25.5
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 23.8
67% 23.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 18.9
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X370 Taichi Builds (Compare 637 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Taichi - $250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $1,157
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback