Gigabyte GA-H310M H

Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	23% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	70.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H310M H (all builds)
Memory	11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190605
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Oct 01 '20 at 16:17
Run Duration	156 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-8100-$110 81,392 User benchmarks, average bench 71% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	78.7% Very good	Memory 83.1 1-Core 116 2-Core 233 80% 144 Pts	4-Core 424 8-Core 453 58% 439 Pts	64-Core 455 28% 455 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 78.7% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170 123,956 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Gigabyte(1458 354E) 2GB CLim: 1284 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.55 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	23% Poor	Lighting 27.5 Reflection 24.5 Parallax 32.7 22% 28.2 fps	MRender 33.6 Gravity 29.8 Splatting 26.7 24% 30 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 23% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX200 240GB-$36 36,559 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 26GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU02.6 SusWrite @10s intervals: 265 53 54 54 55 55 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	70.4% Very good	Read 497 Write 438 Mixed 400 SusWrite 89.1 80% 356 MB/s	4K Read 29.8 4K Write 61.5 4K Mixed 39.2 128% 43.5 MB/s	DQ Read 171 DQ Write 52.4 DQ Mixed 73.9 64% 99 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 70.4% Great: 91%
WD WD5000AVDS-63U7B1 500GB 24,608 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 22GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 48 49 49 49 49 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	27.8% Poor	Read 48.3 Write 47.4 Mixed 44.8 SusWrite 48.6 35% 47.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.4 74% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 27.8% Great: 52%
WD RE4 500GB (2010)-$30 12,344 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 17GB free Firmware: 01.01S02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 72 72 74 70 73 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	43.9% Average	Read 80.4 Write 80.8 Mixed 61.9 SusWrite 72.3 55% 73.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 1 176% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 43.9% Great: 76%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 3GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 68.2 Write 70.1 Mixed 51.7 47% 63.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 24% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown GP-GR26C16S8K1HU408 04EF TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 16GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	72.1% Very good	MC Read 24.7 MC Write 29.4 MC Mixed 22.7 73% 25.6 GB/s	SC Read 13.3 SC Write 29.7 SC Mixed 22.7 63% 21.9 GB/s	Latency 75 53% 75 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 85%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H310M H Builds (Compare 1,754 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 26%

Raft

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M H

CPU
Core i5-8400Intel $114Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	399x
Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples	382x
Core i5-9400FIntel $85Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	297x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	196x
UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i3)IntelBench 5%, 32,403 samples	129x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	123x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	167x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	90x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	69x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	52x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	44x
HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GBKingstonBench 40%, 46,352 samples	36x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $201

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369