To Intel X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics27.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardTo Intel X79  (all builds)
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20200613
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateOct 01 '20 at 12:56
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2420 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
70% Very good
Memory 91.1
1-Core 67.6
2-Core 138
61% 98.7 Pts
4-Core 266
8-Core 403
42% 334 Pts
64-Core 525
32% 525 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 70%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
Gigabyte(1458 36D5) 2GB
CLim: 1418 MHz, MLim: 1909 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.87
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
27.7% Poor
Lighting 34.2
Reflection 31
Parallax 29.4
28% 31.5 fps
MRender 41.7
Gravity 29.8
Splatting 30.4
27% 34 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
TOSHIBA-TR200 240GB
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFA12.4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 99 33 33 21 16 MB/s
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47.6% Average
Read 196
Write 140
Mixed 211
SusWrite 36.4
33% 146 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 44.5
4K Mixed 26.7
97% 32.4 MB/s
DQ Read 152
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 71
82% 139 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
53GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 165 142 142 164 138 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Read 159
Write 159
Mixed 72.6
SusWrite 149
98% 135 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT151R7TFR4A 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
55.2% Above average
MC Read 23.1
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 19.3
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 9.8
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 65.6
61% 65.6 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Intel X79 Builds (Compare 1,981 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

Motherboard: To Intel X79

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $158
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback