Toshiba Satellite L555D

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 20%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemToshiba Satellite L555D  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA NTWAE
Memory1.6 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20091126
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 01 '20 at 09:21
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Turion II Mobile M500
Socket M2/S1G1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
29.9% Poor
Memory 49.8
1-Core 28.2
2-Core 56.8
29% 44.9 Pts
4-Core 60.1
8-Core 62.6
8% 61.3 Pts
64-Core 63.5
4% 63.5 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 42%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon 4100
Toshiba(1179 FFA0) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.782.0.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.45% Terrible
Lighting 0.43
Reflection 1.04
Parallax 0.31
0% 0.59 fps
MRender 0.71
Gravity 0.67
Splatting 0.91
1% 0.76 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.45%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fujitsu MJA2250BH G2 250GB
213GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0040
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 44 38 47 55 55 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
27.6% Poor
Read 50
Write 57.3
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 45.8
35% 47.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.4
89% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Toshiba 8HTF12864HDY-800G1 64T128020EDL2.5C2 3GB
800, 800 MHz
2048, 1024 MB
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
19.2% Very poor
MC Read 7.3
MC Write 5.7
MC Mixed 6.9
19% 6.63 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 4.9
14% 5.03 GB/s
Latency 161
25% 161 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite L555D Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite L555D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback