Lenovo F0E50000US

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics20.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo F0E50000US  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 36F9
Memory5.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190214
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateSep 30 '20 at 21:17
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
Memory 91.3
1-Core 115
2-Core 263
86% 156 Pts
4-Core 537
8-Core 796
83% 666 Pts
64-Core 1,108
69% 1,108 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 560X
Legend(17AA 36F9) ≥ 4GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 27.20.1016.1
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
20.8% Poor
Lighting 24.9
Reflection 26.1
Parallax 29.3
20% 26.8 fps
MRender 26.6
Gravity 23.7
Splatting 28.9
22% 26.4 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-000L7 256GB
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1L2QEXD7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,050
Write 1,265
Mixed 677
223% 997 MB/s
4K Read 41.7
4K Write 83.8
4K Mixed 54.9
178% 60.1 MB/s
DQ Read 973
DQ Write 299
DQ Mixed 853
572% 708 MB/s
Poor: 106% Great: 247%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
819GB free
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 114 115 115 115 112 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
61.5% Good
Read 100
Write 99.5
Mixed 61.8
SusWrite 113
69% 93.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 0.8
184% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.5% Good
MC Read 24.5
MC Write 24.3
MC Mixed 21.4
67% 23.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.3
SC Write 29.4
SC Mixed 22.5
67% 23.4 GB/s
Latency 65.3
61% 65.3 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F0E50000US Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo F0E50000US

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 137% - Outstanding Total price: $341
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback