Asus PRIME Z270-P

Performance Results


Gaming 54% Yacht	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 48% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	80.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	80.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME Z270-P (all builds)
Memory	11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180222
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 29 '20 at 15:14
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	19%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700-$170 282,363 User benchmarks, average bench 72% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	61.5% Good	Memory 54.6 1-Core 113 2-Core 210 68% 126 Pts	4-Core 368 8-Core 527 56% 448 Pts	64-Core 618 38% 618 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 61.5% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$288 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% EVGA(3842 2068) CLim: 2265 MHz, MLim: 3715 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.38 Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	80.6% Excellent	Lighting 102 Reflection 106 Parallax 103 84% 104 fps	MRender 123 Gravity 83.9 Splatting 75.7 75% 94.4 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 80.6% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
CT250MX500SSD4 250GB 16,301 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 166GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 410 416 416 221 194 200 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	80.6% Excellent	Read 461 Write 407 Mixed 411 SusWrite 310 89% 397 MB/s	4K Read 37.6 4K Write 95.3 4K Mixed 3.9 112% 45.6 MB/s	DQ Read 333 DQ Write 242 DQ Mixed 260 202% 278 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 80.6% Great: 121%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$39 55,121 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 340GB free Firmware: 17.01H17 SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 41 40 41 42 43 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	41.4% Average	Read 102 Write 101 Mixed 73.7 SusWrite 42.1 59% 79.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.3 83% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 41.4% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata 4x4GB 1,028 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	75.1% Very good	MC Read 27.6 MC Write 29.1 MC Mixed 25.4 78% 27.4 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 32.7 SC Mixed 24.3 68% 23.8 GB/s	Latency 145 28% 145 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 75.1% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME Z270-P Builds (Compare 6,456 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 71%

Battleship

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 61%

Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z270-P - $140

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $235Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	2,076x
Core i5-7600KIntel $170Bench 76%, 195,006 samples	1,076x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	771x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	852x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	837x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	553x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	250x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	189x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	140x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	315x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	257x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 77%, 131,007 samples	133x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 92% - Outstanding

Total price: $655

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16