Lenovo 10FGS1431V

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics15.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (64%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 10FGS1431V  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 30BC
Memory13.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200818
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateSep 29 '20 at 05:28
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 64%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$60
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
67.5% Good
Memory 73.3
1-Core 98.9
2-Core 193
69% 122 Pts
4-Core 349
8-Core 401
49% 375 Pts
64-Core 387
24% 387 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Gigabyte(1458 375C) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.55
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Lighting 19
Reflection 14.7
Parallax 17.7
16% 17.1 fps
MRender 16
Gravity 18.5
Splatting 19.6
15% 18 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
165GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 343 395 401 413 417 415 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 471
Write 413
Mixed 403
SusWrite 397
95% 421 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 73.2
4K Mixed 46.1
144% 49.9 MB/s
DQ Read 360
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 271
220% 313 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 103%
Great: 125%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
235GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 350 403 407 420 389 373 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 474
Write 413
Mixed 408
SusWrite 390
95% 421 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 82
4K Mixed 49.7
155% 54.5 MB/s
DQ Read 356
DQ Write 305
DQ Mixed 276
222% 312 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 106%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMUA5110MB78HAF2400 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68% Good
MC Read 23.6
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 23.2
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 23
SC Mixed 19.6
53% 18.7 GB/s
Latency 94
42% 94 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 68%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback