Performance Results


Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	48.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	50% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Asus TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX504GM
Memory	8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190610
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Sep 28 '20 at 17:57
Run Duration	135 Seconds
Run User	CHL-User
Background CPU	24%

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8300H 167,898 User benchmarks, average bench 65% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	50.8% Above average	Memory 76.2 1-Core 57.2 2-Core 105 50% 79.4 Pts	4-Core 140 8-Core 202 21% 171 Pts	64-Core 272 17% 272 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 50.8% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile) 177,775 User benchmarks, average bench 47% Asus(1043 1391) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 452.06 Performing below potential (64^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	48.5% Average	Lighting 59.2 Reflection 64 Parallax 58.8 48% 60.6 fps	MRender 62.9 Gravity 52.6 Splatting 63 49% 59.5 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 48.5% Great: 52%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ 128GB 18,233 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 21GB free (System drive) Firmware: E8FK11.C SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 94 92 44 56 22 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	50% Above average	Read 421 Write 117 Mixed 261 SusWrite 81.9 48% 220 MB/s	4K Read 4.1 4K Write 43.6 4K Mixed 19.7 54% 22.5 MB/s	DQ Read 271 DQ Write 207 DQ Mixed 262 190% 247 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 50% Great: 115%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB 294,991 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 379GB free Firmware: 04.01A04 SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 50 71 61 52 55 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	51.1% Above average	Read 122 Write 99 Mixed 57.5 SusWrite 54.8 61% 83.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 4.1 4K Mixed 0.6 172% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 51.1% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 16GB 284 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2667, 2667 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	58.2% Above average	MC Read 22.3 MC Write 24.6 MC Mixed 19.2 63% 22 GB/s	SC Read 9.7 SC Write 13.9 SC Mixed 9.2 31% 10.9 GB/s	Latency 87.9 46% 87.9 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 58.2% Great: 85%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 35%

Sail boat

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 30%

Sail boat

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	734x
Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples	482x

GPU
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	636x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	579x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	1x

SSD
RBUSNS8154P3256GJ 256GBKingstonBench 96%, 18,615 samples	218x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples	200x
RBUSNS8154P3128GJ 128GBKingstonBench 81%, 18,233 samples	172x

RAM
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 73,050 samples	234x
HMA82GS6CJR8N-VK 1x16GBHynixBench 44%, 33,430 samples	175x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 96,646 samples	86x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16