Asus TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics49.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAsus TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX504GM
Memory8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190610
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateSep 30 '20 at 21:06
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU 60%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
64.9% Good
Memory 87.2
1-Core 96.7
2-Core 164
70% 116 Pts
4-Core 238
8-Core 304
35% 271 Pts
64-Core 305
19% 305 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 1391) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.4% Average
Lighting 60.9
Reflection 68.5
Parallax 55.9
50% 61.8 fps
MRender 62.2
Gravity 53.2
Splatting 62.6
49% 59.4 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ 128GB
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FK11.C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 111 82 89 84 83 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
61.1% Good
Read 505
Write 140
Mixed 194
SusWrite 93.8
51% 233 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 56.4
4K Mixed 22.1
90% 33.2 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 141
DQ Mixed 156
121% 168 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 115%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
343GB free
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 89 89 89 89 90 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
71% Very good
Read 158
Write 98.2
Mixed 74.8
SusWrite 88.8
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.8
204% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 71%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.1% Good
MC Read 23.6
MC Write 25.5
MC Mixed 21.7
67% 23.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 22.8
SC Mixed 18.9
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 70.3
57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM Builds (Compare 1,220 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat

System: Asus TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback