Asus P8P67-M PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics18.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P8P67-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory2.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121130
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 26 '20 at 12:35
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Memory 89.7
1-Core 78.5
2-Core 179
68% 116 Pts
4-Core 311
8-Core 307
42% 309 Pts
64-Core 346
21% 346 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.38
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
18.9% Very poor
Lighting 23.6
Reflection 17.9
Parallax 21.3
19% 20.9 fps
MRender 26.7
Gravity 23.8
Splatting 17.8
18% 22.8 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 480GB-$175
401GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 150 138 109 80 72 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.6% Below average
Read 260
Write 169
Mixed 172
SusWrite 102
39% 176 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 23
4K Mixed 14.4
60% 18.9 MB/s
DQ Read 23.3
DQ Write 58.1
DQ Mixed 31.3
27% 37.6 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 92%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$32
930GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 127 128 129 128 125 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
69.4% Good
Read 123
Write 110
Mixed 62
SusWrite 119
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 68%
ASMT Verbatim Vx500 120GB
68GB free, PID 025a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 28 28 28 29 29 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
35.9% Below average
Read 33
Write 28
Mixed 29
SusWrite 27.6
40% 29.4 MB/s
4K Read 7.4
4K Write 7.6
4K Mixed 5.1
459% 6.7 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 279%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-199.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
50.2% Above average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 16.3
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 12.4
SC Mixed 16.4
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 67.6
59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67-M PRO Builds (Compare 389 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67-M PRO - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $554
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback