Performance Results


Gaming 64% Destroyer	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 61% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	76.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	235% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X570 GAMING X (all builds)
Memory	116.6 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191206
Uptime	2.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 20 '20 at 08:58
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$185 123,820 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	75.5% Very good	Memory 73 1-Core 107 2-Core 208 72% 129 Pts	4-Core 419 8-Core 706 68% 562 Pts	64-Core 1,016 63% 1,016 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 75.5% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Zotac(19DA 1445) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 452.06 Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	76.3% Very good	Lighting 94.7 Reflection 106 Parallax 97 77% 99.2 fps	MRender 90.6 Gravity 88.4 Splatting 92.9 74% 90.6 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 76.3% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139 63,520 User benchmarks, average bench 266% 127GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1173 1194 1202 1228 1123 922 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	235% Outstanding	Read 2,085 Write 1,232 Mixed 833 SusWrite 1,140 294% 1,323 MB/s	4K Read 39 4K Write 77.5 4K Mixed 50.1 164% 55.5 MB/s	DQ Read 798 DQ Write 598 DQ Mixed 682 514% 693 MB/s
Poor: 159% ↑ This bench: 235% Great: 353%
Samsung SSD 860 EVO 1TB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 154% 496GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 58 62 63 63 63 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	114% Outstanding	Read 127 Write 123 Mixed 124 SusWrite 61.7 145% 109 MB/s	4K Read 18.8 4K Write 25.2 4K Mixed 21.3 1,651% 21.8 MB/s	DQ Read 20.3 DQ Write 35.1 DQ Mixed 27.2 2,194% 27.5 MB/s
Poor: 91% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 227%
WDC WD20 EZRZ-00Z5HB0 2TB 101 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 59 62 63 63 63 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	39.4% Below average	Read 122 Write 109 Mixed 63.3 SusWrite 61.9 114% 89.1 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 126% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 39.4% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BL32G32C16U4W.M16FB1 4x31.8GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 4 of 4 slots used 127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Relative performance (0^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	87.2% Excellent	MC Read 34.8 MC Write 29.3 MC Mixed 30.1 90% 31.4 GB/s	SC Read 24.2 SC Write 32.9 SC Mixed 26.8 80% 28 GB/s	Latency 94.7 42% 94.7 ns
Poor: 87% ↑ This bench: 87.2% Great: 184%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	352x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	282x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	243x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	148x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	127x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	113x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	150x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	114x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	114x

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $845

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16