RM DESKTOP ECOQUIET 320

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics47.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemRM DESKTOP ECOQUIET 320  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel DQ77CP
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120830
Uptime6.5 Days
Run DateSep 20 '20 at 00:28
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Memory 92.5
1-Core 107
2-Core 206
78% 135 Pts
4-Core 336
8-Core 515
53% 425 Pts
64-Core 516
32% 516 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126
CLim: 1260 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.8.1
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
47.6% Average
Lighting 58.8
Reflection 65.1
Parallax 70.8
48% 64.9 fps
MRender 64.8
Gravity 55.7
Splatting 53.6
47% 58 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 240GB
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM01.7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 309 140 98 77 76 74 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Read 476
Write 230
Mixed 22.6
SusWrite 129
47% 214 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 42.1
4K Mixed 28
94% 31.2 MB/s
DQ Read 324
DQ Write 355
DQ Mixed 200
189% 293 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 99%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
176GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 310 219 218 216 322 224 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
79.3% Very good
Read 458
Write 167
Mixed 362
SusWrite 252
69% 310 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 48.1
4K Mixed 30.7
104% 34.9 MB/s
DQ Read 269
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 209
183% 270 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 100%
LITEON UITRA1 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0578
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 136 135 136 137 134 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
54.6% Above average
Read 134
Write 134
Mixed 78.9
SusWrite 135
162% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 58%
KINGSTON SA400S37240G 240GB
157GB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 201 150 42 43 42 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Read 238
Write 200
Mixed 179
SusWrite 112
237% 182 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 22
4K Mixed 18
1,422% 18.9 MB/s
DQ Read 20.2
DQ Write 32.2
DQ Mixed 23.1
1,956% 25.2 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 130%
Great: 144%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMZ16GX3M4A1600C9 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMZ4GX3M1A1600C9 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
59.5% Above average
MC Read 21.7
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 19
58% 20.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 19.3
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 63.2
63% 63.2 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical DESKTOP ECOQUIET 320 Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

System: RM DESKTOP ECOQUIET 320

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $119
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback