Asus P8P67 LE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics56.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8P67 LE  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121228
Uptime3.3 Days
Run DateJun 18 '19 at 13:21
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Memory 92
1-Core 109
2-Core 216
80% 139 Pts
4-Core 428
8-Core 537
62% 482 Pts
64-Core 521
32% 521 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 430.64
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
56.8% Above average
Lighting 69.8
Reflection 69.9
Parallax 67.1
57% 68.9 fps
MRender 71.3
Gravity 68.1
Splatting 68.1
56% 69.2 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 480GB
278GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 196 93 28 27 32 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
35.3% Below average
Read 355
Write 157
Mixed 122
SusWrite 93.6
40% 182 MB/s
4K Read 14.6
4K Write 22.4
4K Mixed 10.2
47% 15.7 MB/s
DQ Read 27.6
DQ Write 32
DQ Mixed 23.5
20% 27.7 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 182%
WD Purple 1TB (2014)-$60
54GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 91 96 99 92 91 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
58.3% Above average
Read 110
Write 111
Mixed 67.2
SusWrite 92.8
70% 95.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMZ16GX3M4A1600C9 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMZ4GX3M1A1600C9 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
56.6% Above average
MC Read 19.6
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 18.3
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 18.6
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 64
62% 64 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 LE Builds (Compare 1,247 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 LE - $113

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $635
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback