Oegstone CS-B

Performance Results


Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 25% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	42.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	54.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Oegstone CS-B (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK CS-B
Memory	5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140303
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Sep 19 '20 at 13:10
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4590S-$79 11,598 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	65.7% Good	Memory 90.5 1-Core 109 2-Core 204 78% 134 Pts	4-Core 248 8-Core 201 31% 224 Pts	64-Core 179 11% 179 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 65.7% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Asus(1043 8509) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.38 Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	42.8% Average	Lighting 50 Reflection 53.9 Parallax 43.8 41% 49.2 fps	MRender 68.5 Gravity 54.2 Splatting 51.3 47% 58 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 42.8% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY SSD2SC120G3LC763C121S443 120GB 38 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 63GB free (System drive) Firmware: 60HABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 89 97 100 95 106 MB/s Performing below potential (82^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	54.5% Above average	Read 208 Write 125 Mixed 163 SusWrite 96 33% 148 MB/s	4K Read 20.4 4K Write 96.1 4K Mixed 27.8 117% 48.1 MB/s	DQ Read 86.4 DQ Write 124 DQ Mixed 98.5 76% 103 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 54.5% Great: 64%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA662 500GB 14,997 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 341GB free Firmware: JP2OA50E SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 136 136 137 137 137 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	76.1% Very good	Read 135 Write 130 Mixed 66.6 SusWrite 130 84% 115 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 76.1% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 4x2GB 1,822 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	62.8% Good	MC Read 22.1 MC Write 23.7 MC Mixed 19.8 62% 21.9 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 18.8 SC Mixed 21 54% 19 GB/s	Latency 66.6 60% 66.6 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 62.8% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CS-B Builds (Compare 218 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Oegstone CS-B

CPU
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	57x
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	31x
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	25x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	30x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	17x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	15x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	13x
HG6 mSATA 256GBToshibaBench 75%, 1,754 samples	7x
SU900 256GBAdataBench 86%, 1,844 samples	6x

RAM
99U5402-052.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 50%, 492 samples	12x
99U5403-160.A00LF 2x8GBKingstonBench 55%, 708 samples	9x
99U5403-160.A00LF 1x8GBKingstonBench 31%, 649 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $178

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16