Oegstone CS-B

Performance Results


Gaming 30% Sail boat	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	44.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	62% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Oegstone CS-B (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK CS-B
Memory	5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140303
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 01 '20 at 16:39
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4590S-$79 11,598 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	58% Above average	Memory 84.9 1-Core 95.5 2-Core 156 68% 112 Pts	4-Core 186 8-Core 167 24% 176 Pts	64-Core 160 10% 160 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 58% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Asus(1043 8509) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.55 Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	44.1% Average	Lighting 52.1 Reflection 53.9 Parallax 48.1 42% 51.4 fps	MRender 68.8 Gravity 56.1 Splatting 51.7 47% 58.9 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 44.1% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY SSD2SC120G3LC763C121S443 120GB 38 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 61GB free (System drive) Firmware: 60HABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 98 96 102 103 101 MB/s Performing below potential (92^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	62% Good	Read 231 Write 127 Mixed 174 SusWrite 99.1 35% 158 MB/s	4K Read 25.5 4K Write 96.5 4K Mixed 36.5 136% 52.8 MB/s	DQ Read 85.7 DQ Write 124 DQ Mixed 80.1 67% 96.5 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 64%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA662 500GB 14,997 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 341GB free Firmware: JP2OA50E SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 130 138 137 138 137 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	76.6% Very good	Read 136 Write 134 Mixed 68.7 SusWrite 131 86% 118 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 76.6% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 4x2GB 1,822 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	62% Good	MC Read 21.7 MC Write 23.4 MC Mixed 20.3 62% 21.8 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 18.8 SC Mixed 19.2 52% 18.2 GB/s	Latency 72 56% 72 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CS-B Builds (Compare 218 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Oegstone CS-B

CPU
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	57x
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	31x
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	25x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	30x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	17x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	15x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	13x
HG6 mSATA 256GBToshibaBench 75%, 1,754 samples	7x
SU900 256GBAdataBench 86%, 1,844 samples	6x

RAM
99U5402-052.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 50%, 492 samples	12x
99U5403-160.A00LF 2x8GBKingstonBench 55%, 708 samples	9x
99U5403-160.A00LF 1x8GBKingstonBench 31%, 649 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $178

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16