Asus P8P67-M PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics9.97% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive26% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8P67-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory6.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121130
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateSep 19 '20 at 08:48
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 73%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Memory 84.2
1-Core 84.2
2-Core 168
66% 112 Pts
4-Core 325
8-Core 323
43% 324 Pts
64-Core 322
20% 322 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 70%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 645
Device(1B0A 90CC) 2GB
CLim: 823 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
9.97% Terrible
Lighting 11.6
Reflection 10.8
Parallax 13.7
10% 12 fps
MRender 14.7
Gravity 14
Splatting 12.2
11% 13.6 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.97%
Great: 10%
Nvidia GeForce GT 640
Gainward(10B0 1282) 1GB
CLim: 1045 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
7.89% Terrible
Lighting 9.87
Reflection 9.04
Parallax 10.6
8% 9.83 fps
MRender 12.2
Gravity 8.5
Splatting 7.91
8% 9.53 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.89%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ VERTEX2 60GB
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.37
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 30 32 32 29 33 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
26% Poor
Read 123
Write 54.4
Mixed 65.9
SusWrite 32.3
15% 68.9 MB/s
4K Read 11.3
4K Write 37.5
4K Mixed 12.7
53% 20.5 MB/s
DQ Read 78
DQ Write 52.9
DQ Mixed 47.7
40% 59.5 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 26%
Great: 51%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$56
423GB free
Firmware: AX001U
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 81 85 85 84 84 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
47.5% Average
Read 81.6
Write 80.5
Mixed 31
SusWrite 83.6
50% 69.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 029E CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 029E CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.4% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 16.1
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 14.2
SC Mixed 13.9
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 73
55% 73 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67-M PRO Builds (Compare 389 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67-M PRO - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $554
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback