Gigabyte GA-H270-Gaming 3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics12.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive267% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H270-Gaming 3  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180309
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 17 '20 at 12:15
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$60
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.9% Very good
Memory 80.4
1-Core 112
2-Core 221
77% 138 Pts
4-Core 424
8-Core 422
57% 423 Pts
64-Core 310
19% 310 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 2138 MHz, MLim: 2112 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 452.06
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
12.7% Very poor
Lighting 2.3
Reflection 34
Parallax 39.2
2% 25.2 fps
MRender 45.1
Gravity 40.9
Splatting 39
34% 41.7 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 33%
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7262
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
6.62% Terrible
Lighting 6.93
Reflection 9.35
Parallax 7.44
6% 7.91 fps
MRender 9
Gravity 6.4
Splatting 14.2
8% 9.86 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.62%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
XPG SPECTRIX S40G 256GB
174GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VB411D43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 886 950 1042 702 1107 957 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
267% Outstanding
Read 2,376
Write 769
Mixed 872
SusWrite 941
273% 1,240 MB/s
4K Read 53.6
4K Write 142
4K Mixed 75.8
254% 90.6 MB/s
DQ Read 736
DQ Write 858
DQ Mixed 806
605% 800 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 267%
Great: 273%
WD Green 120GB (2016)-$84
59GB free
Firmware: Z3311000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 86 128 86 99 86 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
68.2% Good
Read 359
Write 365
Mixed 336
SusWrite 119
66% 295 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 22.1
126% 52.7 MB/s
DQ Read 149
DQ Write 286
DQ Mixed 34.6
78% 156 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 71%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
863GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 105 105 105 105 105 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Read 206
Write 170
Mixed 85
SusWrite 105
104% 141 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
225% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown W641GU48J7240ND Kingston 9905678-005.A00G 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
71.4% Very good
MC Read 26.1
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 21.8
72% 25.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 28.6
SC Mixed 22
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 79.9
50% 79.9 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H270-Gaming 3 Builds (Compare 1,315 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H270-Gaming 3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $383
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback