Gigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming 3-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive60% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Default string
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming 3-CF  (all builds)
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display5760 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170220
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 04 '17 at 05:09
Run Duration261 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
63.8% Good
Memory 70.8
1-Core 76.4
2-Core 155
58% 101 Pts
4-Core 305
8-Core 611
54% 458 Pts
64-Core 1239
77% 1239 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 390-$325
CLim: 1155 MHz, MLim: 1650 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.3.3
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 45% Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
140GB free
Firmware: CXB7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
242% Outstanding
Read 2,588
Write 1,132
Mixed 1,409
375% 1,710 MB/s
4K Read 58.4
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 40.9
204% 72.8 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 179
DQ Mixed 76
88% 152 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 242%
Great: 236%
Samsung 840 120GB-$109
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT09B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
60% Good
Read 478
Write 97.1
Mixed 92.6
48% 223 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 79.7
4K Mixed 10.4
96% 39 MB/s
DQ Read 231
DQ Write 117
DQ Mixed 26.8
59% 125 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 60%
Great: 73%
Toshiba X300 5TB-$125
4TB free
Firmware: FP2A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
62% Good
Read 113
Write 103
Mixed 68.4
70% 94.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.15
4K Write 1.83
4K Mixed 0.34
120% 1.11 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 62%
Great: 109%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49
1TB free
Firmware: CC52 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
68.3% Good
Read 124
Write 114
Mixed 111
88% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.61
4K Write 0.93
4K Mixed 0.13
57% 0.56 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 96%
Seagate BUP Slim 500GB
378GB free
Firmware: 0304
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
59.7% Above average
Read 103
Write 105
Mixed 94.6
76% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.19
71% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 61%
WD Blue 320GB (2010)-$40
295GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
62.3% Good
Read 106
Write 111
Mixed 110
82% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 2.01
4K Mixed 0.47
116% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 65%
WDC WD25 00BPVT-22JJ5T0 250GB
233GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29% Poor
Read 67.4
Write 67
Mixed 54.2
80% 62.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 1.48
4K Mixed 0.14
57% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29%
Great: 29%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-3200C DDR4 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
78.2% Very good
MC Read 30.3
MC Write 29
MC Mixed 26.7
82% 28.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 28.1
SC Mixed 20.3
63% 22.2 GB/s
Latency 99.5
40% 99.5 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AB350-Gaming 3-CF Builds (Compare 2,729 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming 3-CF - $90

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $464
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback