Asrock N68C-S UCC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics39.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive18.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock N68C-S UCC  (all builds)
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20110919
Uptime2 Days
Run DateSep 16 '20 at 10:43
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 945
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Memory 82.5
1-Core 44.9
2-Core 87.9
48% 71.8 Pts
4-Core 170
8-Core 172
23% 171 Pts
64-Core 174
11% 174 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
CLim: 1070 MHz, MLim: 1550 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.4.4
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
39.5% Below average
Lighting 51.8
Reflection 34.8
Parallax 65.1
42% 50.6 fps
MRender 32.2
Gravity 50
Splatting 42.3
34% 41.5 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
V Series SATA SSD 24 240GB
108GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V4.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 93 93 93 95 94 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
18.1% Very poor
Read 110
Write 88.2
Mixed 87.5
SusWrite 93.6
21% 95 MB/s
4K Read 11.4
4K Write 6
4K Mixed 5.2
27% 7.53 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 46%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$31
465GB free
Firmware: CA12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 99 102 100 102 102 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Read 91.2
Write 91
Mixed 48.7
SusWrite 101
61% 82.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
158% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29% Poor
MC Read 12
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 10.7
28% 9.7 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 8.3
19% 6.73 GB/s
Latency 76.1
53% 76.1 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 29%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N68C-S UCC Builds (Compare 214 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68C-S UCC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback