MSI MS-16GF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics18.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemMicro-Star GE60 2QE
MotherboardMSI MS-16GF  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20150127
Uptime9.2 Days
Run DateApr 03 '17 at 22:07
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4720HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Memory 84.2
1-Core 105
2-Core 200
74% 129 Pts
4-Core 330
8-Core 537
53% 433 Pts
64-Core 539
33% 539 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960M
MSI(1462 1107) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 21.21.13.7866
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
18.3% Very poor
Lighting 23.4
Reflection 17.2
Parallax 19.4
19% 20 fps
MRender 22.2
Gravity 23.3
Splatting 17
17% 20.8 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow mS200 mSATA 120GB-$100
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 608ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
61.5% Good
Read 505
Write 105
Mixed 157
55% 256 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 79.7
4K Mixed 16.7
102% 40.6 MB/s
DQ Read 94.8
DQ Write 136
DQ Mixed 31.7
47% 87.4 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 81%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
698GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Read 135
Write 130
Mixed 128
99% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.32
4K Mixed 0.16
63% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9S3L/8G MSI16D3LS1MNG/8G 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
57.7% Above average
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 16.8
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 21
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 73.2
55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16GF Builds (Compare 460 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16GF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback