MSI MS-1793

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star GP72 2QD
MotherboardMSI MS-1793  (all builds)
Memory9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150826
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 29 '18 at 17:50
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 7 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
54.5% Above average
Memory 79.4
1-Core 49
2-Core 86
47% 71.5 Pts
4-Core 163
8-Core 251
26% 207 Pts
64-Core 253
16% 253 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 5600
MSI(1462 114D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
4.27% Terrible
Lighting 4.33
Reflection 10
Parallax 5.66
4% 6.66 fps
MRender 6.9
Gravity 3.87
Splatting 9.22
6% 6.66 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.27%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS128G39MNC-3310A 128GB
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20001P00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 175 149 143 145 140 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
69.1% Good
Read 354
Write 269
Mixed 269
SusWrite 164
59% 264 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 65.7
4K Mixed 29
112% 40.5 MB/s
DQ Read 276
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 152
136% 208 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 92%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
626GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 75 76 76 76 76 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
44.7% Average
Read 80.2
Write 82
Mixed 19.3
SusWrite 75.7
46% 64.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
114% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9S3L/8G MSI16D3LS1MNG/8G 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
40.1% Average
MC Read 14
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 13.8
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 8.4
19% 6.73 GB/s
Latency 81.7
49% 81.7 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-1793 Builds (Compare 147 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-1793

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback