Asus STRIX Z270H GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics17.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive120% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus STRIX Z270H GAMING  (all builds)
Memory26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 11 '20 at 11:47
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7600K-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Memory 92.5
1-Core 158
2-Core 314
102% 188 Pts
4-Core 624
8-Core 624
83% 624 Pts
64-Core 583
36% 583 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 100%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Gigabyte(1458 362D) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
17.5% Very poor
Lighting 21.9
Reflection 16.7
Parallax 19.6
18% 19.4 fps
MRender 24.6
Gravity 22.1
Splatting 16.3
17% 21 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$182
364GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 339 459 476 483 484 483 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 480
Mixed 378
SusWrite 454
102% 455 MB/s
4K Read 36.7
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 50.3
180% 67 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 360
271% 363 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 120%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
222GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 356 472 483 487 487 476 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 470
Mixed 417
SusWrite 460
104% 461 MB/s
4K Read 47.2
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 65.2
221% 78.7 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 362
272% 363 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 133%
Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
176GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 356 472 482 487 487 487 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
131% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 486
Mixed 462
SusWrite 462
108% 479 MB/s
4K Read 44.1
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 62.6
213% 77.2 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 362
272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 131%
Great: 133%
Samsung Flash Drive 257GB
54GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 65 60 67 59 66 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 15% Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 Kingston KHX2666C15D4/8G CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 Kingston KHX2666C15D4/8G 32GB
3000, 3000, 3000, 3000 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
99.5% Outstanding
MC Read 35.5
MC Write 39
MC Mixed 32.1
102% 35.5 GB/s
SC Read 21.8
SC Write 40.9
SC Mixed 29.9
88% 30.9 GB/s
Latency 63.1
63% 63.1 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 99.5%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical STRIX Z270H GAMING Builds (Compare 3,250 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus STRIX Z270H GAMING - $247

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $899
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback