Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 32% Sail boat	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 30% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	31.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	72.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191113
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Sep 10 '20 at 20:16
Run Duration	157 Seconds
Run User	MDA-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$150 179,588 User benchmarks, average bench 73% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	77% Very good	Memory 78.7 1-Core 113 2-Core 228 78% 140 Pts	4-Core 406 8-Core 652 65% 529 Pts	64-Core 908 56% 908 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 77% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Zotac(19DA A454) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 451.48 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	31.9% Below average	Lighting 39.8 Reflection 31.3 Parallax 37.8 32% 36.3 fps	MRender 38.5 Gravity 38.7 Splatting 36.5 31% 37.9 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31.9% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Apacer AS350 240GB 2,810 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 53GB free (System drive) Firmware: V4.7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 253 139 144 145 143 144 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	72.3% Very good	Read 465 Write 437 Mixed 355 SusWrite 161 79% 355 MB/s	4K Read 31.7 4K Write 71.1 4K Mixed 24.5 117% 42.4 MB/s	DQ Read 174 DQ Write 230 DQ Mixed 35.5 73% 147 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 72.3% Great: 99%
WD Blue 2.5" 160GB (2009)-$23 13,176 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 103GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 68 69 68 65 68 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	38.8% Below average	Read 67.8 Write 74 Mixed 39.5 SusWrite 67.3 46% 62.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 38.8% Great: 36%
Hitachi HTS541010B7E610 1TB 40,802 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 320GB free Firmware: 03.01A03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 52 42 52 51 47 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	19.2% Very poor	Read 16.5 Write 20.7 Mixed 70.5 SusWrite 49.5 30% 39.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 0.4 116% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 19.2% Great: 72%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32 118,349 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 31GB free Firmware: AM001U SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 65 64 65 65 65 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	36.2% Below average	Read 61.2 Write 60.5 Mixed 25.3 SusWrite 64.6 38% 52.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.5 102% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 36.2% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB 239,203 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	85.3% Excellent	MC Read 33.1 MC Write 30.6 MC Mixed 28.9 88% 30.9 GB/s	SC Read 21.7 SC Write 29.9 SC Mixed 24.9 73% 25.5 GB/s	Latency 83 48% 83 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 85.3% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF X470-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 1,436 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 73%

Battleship

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	396x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	133x
Ryzen 7 2700AMD $185Bench 74%, 123,820 samples	129x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	105x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	87x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	74x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	45x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	41x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	41x

RAM
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples	51x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $37Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	50x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	35x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $578

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16