Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 30% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	31.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	74.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191113
Uptime	1.9 Days
Run Date	Sep 22 '20 at 15:28
Run Duration	157 Seconds
Run User	MDA-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$155 179,588 User benchmarks, average bench 73% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	80.9% Excellent	Memory 79.5 1-Core 116 2-Core 233 79% 143 Pts	4-Core 443 8-Core 683 70% 563 Pts	64-Core 917 57% 917 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 80.9% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Zotac(19DA A454) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 452.06 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	31.4% Below average	Lighting 39.3 Reflection 31.5 Parallax 37.9 32% 36.2 fps	MRender 38.6 Gravity 37.3 Splatting 35.6 30% 37.2 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31.4% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Apacer AS350 240GB 2,810 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 50GB free (System drive) Firmware: V4.7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 278 142 142 144 143 144 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	74.2% Very good	Read 470 Write 436 Mixed 364 SusWrite 166 80% 359 MB/s	4K Read 32 4K Write 75.3 4K Mixed 26.3 122% 44.5 MB/s	DQ Read 167 DQ Write 229 DQ Mixed 34.3 72% 143 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 74.2% Great: 99%
WD Blue 2.5" 160GB (2009)-$23 13,176 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 93GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 67 68 63 68 67 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	39.3% Below average	Read 69.8 Write 70.7 Mixed 37.2 SusWrite 66.9 45% 61.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 113% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 39.3% Great: 36%
Hitachi HTS541010B7E610 1TB 40,802 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 311GB free Firmware: 03.01A03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 89 91 89 91 94 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	47.4% Average	Read 73.3 Write 69.7 Mixed 64.5 SusWrite 90.6 55% 74.5 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 4.2 4K Mixed 0.3 153% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 47.4% Great: 72%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32 118,349 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 31GB free Firmware: AM001U SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 65 64 65 65 64 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	35.8% Below average	Read 60.3 Write 61.5 Mixed 25.2 SusWrite 64.4 38% 52.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.5 100% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 35.8% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB 239,203 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	87.2% Excellent	MC Read 33.1 MC Write 32.1 MC Mixed 29.1 90% 31.4 GB/s	SC Read 22.8 SC Write 31 SC Mixed 26.2 76% 26.7 GB/s	Latency 81.5 49% 81.5 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 87.2% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF X470-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 1,435 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 73%

Battleship

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	396x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	133x
Ryzen 7 2700AMD $185Bench 74%, 123,820 samples	129x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	105x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	87x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	74x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	45x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	41x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	41x

RAM
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples	51x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	50x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	35x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $578

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16