Powerspec PowerSpec

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics91.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive82.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemPowerspec PowerSpec  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock Z170 Gaming K6
Memory24.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160817
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateSep 08 '20 at 01:09
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Memory 96.4
1-Core 134
2-Core 250
91% 160 Pts
4-Core 450
8-Core 719
72% 584 Pts
64-Core 717
44% 717 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
Lighting 117
Reflection 120
Parallax 113
96% 117 fps
MRender 98.9
Gravity 105
Splatting 106
85% 103 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$130
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 45 47 46 47 46 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Read 365
Write 364
Mixed 266
SusWrite 74.6
60% 267 MB/s
4K Read 40.8
4K Write 88.6
4K Mixed 49.5
172% 59.6 MB/s
DQ Read 229
DQ Write 228
DQ Mixed 243
178% 233 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 114%
SanDisk Ultra II 480GB-$39
97GB free
Firmware: X31200RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 182 185 147 83 75 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Read 462
Write 443
Mixed 302
SusWrite 152
76% 340 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 97.3
4K Mixed 39.9
142% 54.3 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 223
200% 303 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 108%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 120 124 125 125 124 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
69.4% Good
Read 118
Write 108
Mixed 69.3
SusWrite 124
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
209% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 101%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB
2TB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 156 162 162 161 160 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Read 127
Write 150
Mixed 99.6
SusWrite 157
98% 133 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.7
372% 3.37 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 94%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
116GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 154 155 164 167 169 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Read 128
Write 118
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 159
78% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3200C16-8GTZB 0420 F4-3200C16-8GVKB 0420 F4-3200C16-8GTZB 0420 F4-3200C16-8GVKB 32GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
91% Outstanding
MC Read 37
MC Write 32.7
MC Mixed 25.3
90% 31.7 GB/s
SC Read 21.8
SC Write 35.8
SC Mixed 30.4
84% 29.3 GB/s
Latency 52.7
76% 52.7 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 91%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PowerSpec Builds (Compare 362 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

System: Powerspec PowerSpec

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $610
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback