LG 17Z990-R.AAS7U1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive216% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 90% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemLG 17Z990-R.AAS7U1  (all builds)
MotherboardLG 17Z990
Memory19.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190129
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 05 '20 at 21:16
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
CPU Throttled 90%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8565U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
64% Good
Memory 84.4
1-Core 127
2-Core 217
82% 143 Pts
4-Core 247
8-Core 294
35% 271 Pts
64-Core 284
18% 284 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 64%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Device(1854 0325) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6577
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.4% Terrible
Lighting 1.3
Reflection 2.12
Parallax 1.69
1% 1.7 fps
MRender 2.67
Gravity 1.5
Splatting 3.17
2% 2.45 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.4%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
651GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 631 579 597 642 979 1310 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
216% Outstanding
Read 2061
Write 1601
Mixed 1,445
SusWrite 790
329% 1,474 MB/s
4K Read 51
4K Write 98.8
4K Mixed 66
214% 71.9 MB/s
DQ Read 441
DQ Write 386
DQ Mixed 372
290% 400 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 216%
Great: 410%
Samsung MZNLN256HAJQ-00000 256GB
214GB free
Firmware: MVT2300Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 326 310 311 313 314 314 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 465
Write 410
Mixed 352
SusWrite 315
87% 386 MB/s
4K Read 41.3
4K Write 93.3
4K Mixed 53.1
180% 62.6 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 290
DQ Mixed 325
245% 331 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 109%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT16G4SFD824A.C16FE MEM-DOWN 24GB
2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
73.2% Very good
MC Read 26.4
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 23
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 29.7
SC Mixed 22.8
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 17Z990-R.AAS7U1 Builds (Compare 60 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: LG 17Z990-R.AAS7U1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback