Gigabyte GA-970-GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics34.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive94.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-970-GAMING  (all builds)
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151103
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 05 '20 at 18:02
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8300-$168
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
65.7% Good
Memory 90.8
1-Core 72.5
2-Core 131
62% 98.2 Pts
4-Core 221
8-Core 347
35% 284 Pts
64-Core 356
22% 356 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.8.3
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
34.1% Below average
Lighting 29.9
Reflection 33.2
Parallax 84.8
24% 49.3 fps
MRender 70.1
Gravity 69.6
Splatting 57.7
53% 65.8 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
114GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 355 202 188 175 182 174 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
Read 490
Write 454
Mixed 386
SusWrite 213
86% 386 MB/s
4K Read 37.9
4K Write 77.5
4K Mixed 48.5
161% 54.6 MB/s
DQ Read 281
DQ Write 246
DQ Mixed 262
196% 263 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 124%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$176
92GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 73 73 75 76 76 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
39% Below average
Read 61.4
Write 63.3
Mixed 53.6
SusWrite 74.4
47% 63.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 39%
Great: 63%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
80GB free
Firmware: CC37
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 103 103 103 103 102 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
58.2% Above average
Read 100
Write 93.4
Mixed 60
SusWrite 102
65% 89 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 68%
Seagate ST3750330AS 750GB-$137
33GB free
Firmware: SD1A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 98 101 99 99 99 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 85.8
Write 13.8
Mixed 52
SusWrite 99.1
46% 62.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 58%
ICY BOX 1 3TB
48GB free
Firmware: 9122
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 39 38 38 37 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.9% Below average
Read 82.7
Write 77.3
Mixed 59.5
SusWrite 38.3
48% 64.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
187% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 40%
Seagate ST3750528AS 750GB-$65
70GB free
Firmware: CC34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 81 83 83 86 94 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Read 93.6
Write 92.1
Mixed 64.6
SusWrite 84.5
62% 83.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 65%
ICY BOX 0 3TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 9122
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 39 38 38 37 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.3% Above average
Read 136
Write 136
Mixed 85.4
SusWrite 38.3
73% 99 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
186% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair ValueSelect DDR3 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
50.4% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 15.6
MC Mixed 17.8
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 13.2
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 66.1
60% 66.1 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-970-GAMING Builds (Compare 330 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-970-GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $217
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback