Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3570 104,858 User benchmarks, average bench 65% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	79.3% Very good	Memory 92.8 1-Core 103 2-Core 205 78% 134 Pts	4-Core 378 8-Core 399 52% 389 Pts	64-Core 394 24% 394 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 79.3% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz) 146,665 User benchmarks, average bench 1% ASRock(1849 0152) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.72% Terrible	Lighting 1.77 Reflection 1.73 Parallax 1.41 1% 1.63 fps	MRender 3.57 Gravity 1.07 Splatting 3.48 2% 2.71 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.72% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD3200AAJS 320GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 269GB free (System drive) Firmware: 12.04D.4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 33 72 112 114 114 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	57.4% Above average	Read 114 Write 110 Mixed 76.5 SusWrite 85.5 71% 96.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 129% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 57.4% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
RAMAXEL RMR1870EC58E9F1333 1x4GB 1,247 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	34.6% Below average	MC Read 11.5 MC Write 11.3 MC Mixed 9.9 31% 10.9 GB/s	SC Read 10.7 SC Write 11.6 SC Mixed 10.7 31% 11 GB/s	Latency 62.5 64% 62.5 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 34.6% Great: 30%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 19%

Surfboard

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 15%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	3x
GeForce GTS 450NvidiaBench 7%, 25,436 samples	2x
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples	2x

RAM
M378B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 11,003 samples	2x
2x4GBQUM3U-4G1600C11Bench 51%, 29 samples	2x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	1x

Value: 79% - Very good

Total price: $153