Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics84.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory14.1 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181207
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateAug 31 '20 at 10:34
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Memory 70.5
1-Core 98.5
2-Core 194
68% 121 Pts
4-Core 389
8-Core 702
66% 545 Pts
64-Core 1,060
66% 1,060 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$273
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
84.6% Excellent
Lighting 104
Reflection 113
Parallax 116
85% 111 fps
MRender 134
Gravity 97.7
Splatting 84.1
84% 105 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 120GB-$14
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X01c45
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 421
Write 362
Mixed 338
83% 374 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 69.6
4K Mixed 32.8
117% 42.6 MB/s
DQ Read 135
DQ Write 235
DQ Mixed 184
140% 185 MB/s
Poor: 37% Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
183GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 170 171 169 171 170 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
Read 164
Write 170
Mixed 77.7
SusWrite 170
106% 146 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 113%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
456GB free, PID a207
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 87 87 87 87 87 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
40.3% Average
Read 109
Write 109
Mixed 37.2
SusWrite 86.6
112% 85.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.5
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 2400 20GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.8% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 15.2
44% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 18.3
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,162 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $66

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $337
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback