Fujitsu PRIMERGY TX300 S7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics60.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive56.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory320GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 320GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemFujitsu PRIMERGY TX300 S7  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D2949-A1
Memory270.9 GB free of 320 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display5120 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131011
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 30 '20 at 19:52
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2640 0
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
63.9% Good
Memory 72.1
1-Core 79.4
2-Core 154
60% 102 Pts
4-Core 301
8-Core 472
48% 386 Pts
64-Core 1133
70% 1133 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1692 MHz, MLim: 1828 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
60.9% Good
Lighting 77.4
Reflection 82.4
Parallax 72
63% 77.3 fps
MRender 75.7
Gravity 72.6
Splatting 62.6
57% 70.3 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 54%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intenso Sata III 240GB
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0809B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 432 282 130 84 43 60 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Read 467
Write 412
Mixed 24.9
SusWrite 172
60% 269 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 36
4K Mixed 20.9
77% 25.8 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 35
DQ Mixed 1.8
21% 51.1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT42GR7AFR4C HMT42GR7AFR4C Samsung M393B1K70DH0- HMT42GR7AFR4C HMT42GR7AFR4C Samsung M393B1K70DH0- HMT42GR7AFR4C HMT42GR7AFR4... 320GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
16384, 16384, 8192, 16384, 16384, 8192, 16384, 16384, 8192, 16384, 16384, 8192, 16384, 16384, 8192, 16384, 16384, 8192, 16384, 16384, 8192, 16384, 16384, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
67.7% Good
MC Read 29.4
MC Write 26.6
MC Mixed 25.2
77% 27.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 6
22% 7.63 GB/s
Latency 96.5
41% 96.5 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIMERGY TX300 S7 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

System: Fujitsu PRIMERGY TX300 S7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 114% - Outstanding Total price: $117
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback