Performance Results


Gaming 36% Jet ski	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 36% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	50.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	35.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	320GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 320GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (81%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Fujitsu PRIMERGY TX300 S7 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D2949-A1
Memory	230.6 GB free of 320 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	5120 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131011
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Sep 18 '20 at 00:19
Run Duration	154 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	81%

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2640 0 1,139 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	63.2% Good	Memory 71.8 1-Core 75.4 2-Core 151 58% 99.4 Pts	4-Core 295 8-Core 463 47% 379 Pts	64-Core 1,081 67% 1,081 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 63.2% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Zotac(19DA 1366) CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 452.06 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	50.9% Above average	Lighting 64.2 Reflection 66.3 Parallax 65.2 52% 65.2 fps	MRender 68.6 Gravity 59.2 Splatting 52 48% 59.9 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 50.9% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intenso Sata III 240GB 2,859 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 43GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0809B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 42 31 39 19 43 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	35.8% Below average	Read 412 Write 46.8 Mixed 12.5 SusWrite 35.4 27% 127 MB/s	4K Read 10.3 4K Write 9.5 4K Mixed 18.5 44% 12.8 MB/s	DQ Read 106 DQ Write 8.6 DQ Mixed 17.8 23% 44.1 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 35.8% Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36 203,102 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 328GB free Firmware: CC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 81 41 76 87 40 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	56.4% Above average	Read 129 Write 126 Mixed 74.7 SusWrite 67.5 73% 99.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1.1 187% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 56.4% Great: 70%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 4TB 10,285 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 3TB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 91 126 93 85 126 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 34% Great: 110%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 135GB 111GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 46 38 45 46 42 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT42GR7AFR4C HMT42GR7AFR4C Samsung M393B1K70DH0- HMT42GR7AFR4C HMT42GR7AFR4C Samsung M393B1K70DH0- HMT42GR7AFR4C HMT42GR7AFR4... 320GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz 16384, 16384, 8192, 16384, 16384, 8192, 16384, 16384, 8192, 16384, 16384, 8192, 16384, 16384, 8192, 16384, 16384, 8192, 16384, 16384, 8192, 16384, 16384, 8192 MB Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	64.1% Good	MC Read 26.3 MC Write 25.8 MC Mixed 24.2 73% 25.4 GB/s	SC Read 11.2 SC Write 5.8 SC Mixed 6.5 22% 7.83 GB/s	Latency 97.3 41% 97.3 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 64.1% Great: 108%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 47%

Yacht

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	2x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-4650 01stBench 63%, 86 samples	1x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples	1x

SSD
Sata III 240GBIntensoBench 68%, 2,859 samples	1x
RAID 5/6 SAS 6G 6TBLSIBench 173%, 2 samples	1x

RAM
M393B2G70BH0- M393B2G70QH0- M393B2G70QH0- M393B2G70BH0- M393B2G70QH0- M393B2G70QH0- M393B2G70BH0- M393B2G70QH0- M393B2G70QH0- M393B2G70BH0- M393B2G70... 192GBSamsungBench 67%, 3 samples	1x
M393B2G70BH0- 4x16GBSamsungBench 80%, 218 samples	1x
HMT42GR7AFR4C HMT42GR7AFR4C Samsung M393B1K70DH0- HMT42GR7AFR4C HMT42GR7AFR4C Samsung M393B1K70DH0- HMT42GR7AFR4C HMT42GR7AFR4... 320GBHynixBench 75%, 5 samples	1x

Value: 114% - Outstanding

Total price: $117

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16