Asus P8Z68-V LX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics75.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive72.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8Z68-V LX  (all builds)
Memory8.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130701
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 27 '20 at 09:48
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Memory 81.8
1-Core 89.3
2-Core 174
67% 115 Pts
4-Core 340
8-Core 339
46% 340 Pts
64-Core 333
21% 333 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
75.7% Very good
Lighting 111
Reflection 116
Parallax 97.8
90% 108 fps
MRender 98.5
Gravity 102
Splatting 0.09
48% 66.8 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 1 Volume 487GB
298GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 171 181 187 136 200 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Read 520
Write 414
Mixed 347
SusWrite 179
81% 365 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 39
4K Mixed 27.6
92% 30.1 MB/s
DQ Read 240
DQ Write 302
DQ Mixed 237
188% 260 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 127%
Intel 535 Series 240GB-$200
67GB free
Firmware: RG21
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 191 190 206 213 211 MB/s
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
62.2% Good
Read 238
Write 229
Mixed 220
SusWrite 196
50% 221 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 44.8
4K Mixed 30.9
103% 34 MB/s
DQ Read 192
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 143
121% 176 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 95%
Liteon C V3-CE512-11 SATA 512GB
299GB free
Firmware: 3202
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 27 27 28 28 28 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
18.2% Very poor
Read 31.2
Write 25.2
Mixed 28.5
SusWrite 27.5
21% 28.1 MB/s
4K Read 6.8
4K Write 7.7
4K Mixed 6.9
1,193% 7.13 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 19%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
379GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 89 94 92 96 89 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
50% Average
Read 81.7
Write 70.4
Mixed 53.6
SusWrite 92.2
55% 74.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
156% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 50%
Great: 59%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
447GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 175 178 179 177 179 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
Read 156
Write 138
Mixed 101
SusWrite 176
105% 143 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.2
226% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
780GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 163 164 166 166 166 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
Read 174
Write 164
Mixed 87.1
SusWrite 164
108% 147 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
242% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 109%
NORELSYS 106X 1TB
715GB free, PID 1066
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 166 173 173 173 175 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
66.9% Good
Read 147
Write 148
Mixed 65.8
SusWrite 170
178% 133 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
138% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-001.A01LF 9905584-032.A00LF 99U5584-005.A00LF 99U5471-001.A00LF 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096, 4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.7% Above average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 16.3
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 16
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 77.3
52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z68-V LX Builds (Compare 1,854 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8Z68-V LX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $333
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback