Supox B250A-BTC PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics48.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSupox B250A-BTC PRO  (all builds)
MotherboardSUPoX B250A-BTC PRO
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170801
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 25 '20 at 11:43
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79.5% Very good
Memory 88
1-Core 106
2-Core 198
76% 131 Pts
4-Core 410
8-Core 417
55% 413 Pts
64-Core 415
26% 415 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1150 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.6% Average
Lighting 61.2
Reflection 57.1
Parallax 69.6
50% 62.6 fps
MRender 61.7
Gravity 60.4
Splatting 49.8
46% 57.3 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingbank KP330 60GB
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V2.10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 37 56 39 40 39 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
45% Average
Read 440
Write 105
Mixed 117
SusWrite 45.2
38% 177 MB/s
4K Read 31.1
4K Write 22.4
4K Mixed 8.3
70% 20.6 MB/s
DQ Read 113
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 14.1
37% 78.2 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 45%
Great: 51%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$25
77GB free
Firmware: 07.04C07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 44 43 45 46 46 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
25.5% Poor
Read 44.3
Write 46.8
Mixed 37.2
SusWrite 44.2
32% 43.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 25.5%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-2133C15-8GNT Kingston KHX2666C16/8G 16GB
2133, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
70.7% Very good
MC Read 27
MC Write 28.9
MC Mixed 21.5
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 17.1
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 69.5
58% 69.5 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback