Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-D3H

Performance Results


Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	64.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	94.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-D3H (all builds)
Memory	6.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20151225
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Mar 24 '17 at 17:46
Run Duration	242 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-7870K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$135 9,821 User benchmarks, average bench 46% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	55.8% Above average	Memory 75.8 1-Core 70.4 2-Core 133 56% 93.1 Pts	4-Core 209 8-Core 205 28% 207 Pts	64-Core 209 13% 209 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 55.8% Great: 55%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500 167,107 User benchmarks, average bench 59% MSI(1462 3170) CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 378.49 Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	64.2% Good	Lighting 82 Reflection 81.7 Parallax 71.8 67% 78.5 fps	MRender 79.9 Gravity 74 Splatting 65.9 59% 73.3 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 64.2% Great: 66%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Ocz-vert EX450 256GB 39 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 238GB free Firmware: 3.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 0 0 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 6002 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2118 (AB) Unknown 100 100 35958096 (AE) Unknown 100 100 467 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (D0) Spin buzz 100 100 839 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 1 (E9) Unknown 73 73 73 (F1) Unknown 100 100 6777 (F2) Unknown 100 100 9303 (F9) Unknown 100 100 698799461	92.5% Outstanding	Read 483 Write 467 Mixed 479 106% 476 MB/s	4K Read 20 4K Write 92.9 4K Mixed 25.8 112% 46.2 MB/s	DQ Read 261 DQ Write 223 DQ Mixed 76.4 102% 187 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 92.5% Great: 103%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 107GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3277 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 604 (B1) Unknown 99 99 14 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 60 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 15 (F1) Unknown 99 99 8630359678	94.9% Outstanding	Read 512 Write 385 Mixed 409 97% 435 MB/s	4K Read 33.2 4K Write 67.4 4K Mixed 38.6 136% 46.4 MB/s	DQ Read 237 DQ Write 163 DQ Mixed 79.9 92% 160 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 94.9% Great: 124%
WDC WD10 EZRX-00D8PB0 1TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 931GB free, PID 2336 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	18.1% Very poor	Read 34.1 Write 30.2 Mixed 28 39% 30.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.82 4K Write 2.07 4K Mixed 0.28 83% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 18.1% Great: 18%
WDC WD10 EZEX-08M2NA0 1TB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 654GB free, PID 2336 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	17.3% Very poor	Read 33.9 Write 30.5 Mixed 30.2 40% 31.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.54 4K Write 1.84 4K Mixed 0.23 72% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 17.3% Great: 23%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 2x4GB 165 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 2132 MHz Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	41.1% Average	MC Read 19 MC Write 7.9 MC Mixed 17.1 42% 14.7 GB/s	SC Read 9.4 SC Write 7.5 SC Mixed 12.4 28% 9.77 GB/s	Latency 88.6 45% 88.6 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 41.1% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-F2A88XM-D3H Builds (Compare 332 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-D3H

CPU
A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $135Bench 45%, 19,875 samples	42x
A8-6600K APUAMD $88Bench 50%, 21,890 samples	34x
Athlon II X4 860KAMD $51Bench 45%, 29,887 samples	34x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples	26x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	21x
HD 7750AMDBench 8%, 22,655 samples	18x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	13x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	9x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	8x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 46%, 10,715 samples	8x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GBKingstonBench 39%, 4,786 samples	8x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 27%, 3,795 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 49% - Average

Total price: $163

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16