Asrock Z370M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics19.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive246% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock Z370M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime2 Days
Run DateSep 21 '18 at 02:31
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$114
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Memory 91.3
1-Core 124
2-Core 247
86% 154 Pts
4-Core 492
8-Core 718
76% 605 Pts
64-Core 699
43% 699 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1450 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 399.24
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
19.7% Very poor
Lighting 25
Reflection 18.9
Parallax 22.2
20% 22 fps
MRender 26.8
Gravity 24.4
Splatting 18.6
19% 23.3 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Mushkin Pilot NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$62
206GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVN105 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 885 907 905 901 892 887 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
246% Outstanding
Read 1,651
Write 908
Mixed 872
SusWrite 896
241% 1,082 MB/s
4K Read 61
4K Write 167
4K Mixed 83.8
288% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 705
DQ Write 895
DQ Mixed 554
487% 718 MB/s
Poor: 118%
This bench: 246%
Great: 254%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
98GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 79 80 80 88 81 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
41.2% Average
Read 62.3
Write 61.5
Mixed 44.2
SusWrite 80.9
46% 62.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 62%
WD WD5000AZLX-00K4KA0 500GB
463GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 189 189 188 189 189 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 188
Write 182
Mixed 89.2
SusWrite 188
118% 162 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
218% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 108%
Great: 104%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
683GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 185 184 184 182 185 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 175
Write 135
Mixed 82.2
SusWrite 182
105% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
180% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 102%
Great: 112%
WDC WD50 00AZLX-00CL5A0 500GB
260GB free, PID 2336
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 36 37 35 37 37 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
15.4% Very poor
Read 37.3
Write 37.7
Mixed 22.8
SusWrite 36.3
45% 33.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
44% 0.67 MB/s
WDC WD10 EZEX-08M2NA0 1TB
723GB free, PID 2336
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 42 42 42 41 42 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
22.7% Poor
Read 39
Write 40.5
Mixed 33.3
SusWrite 41.4
53% 38.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
131% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 23%
SAMSUNG HD204UI 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 2336
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 4.5 4.6 4.4 4.6 4.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
13.1% Very poor
Read 38.2
Write 40.5
Mixed 33.5
SusWrite 4.6
38% 29.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
104% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB-$42
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.6% Very good
MC Read 27.8
MC Write 25.6
MC Mixed 20.9
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 25.7
SC Mixed 22.2
61% 21.4 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z370M Pro4 Builds (Compare 1,424 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asrock Z370M Pro4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $440
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback