Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-D3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics61.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive90.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A88XM-D3H  (all builds)
Memory6.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20151225
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 11 '17 at 23:21
Run Duration213 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7870K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$135
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
51.5% Above average
Memory 67.2
1-Core 70.1
2-Core 125
52% 87.3 Pts
4-Core 208
8-Core 210
28% 209 Pts
64-Core 209
13% 209 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 376.19
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
61.9% Good
Lighting 78.8
Reflection 81.6
Parallax 78
64% 79.5 fps
MRender 77.9
Gravity 70.2
Splatting 64.9
57% 71 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
118GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 382
Mixed 407
96% 430 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 64.4
4K Mixed 35.4
123% 42.8 MB/s
DQ Read 264
DQ Write 164
DQ Mixed 96
103% 174 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 124%
WDC WD10 EZRX-00D8PB0 1TB
931GB free, PID 2336
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
17.7% Very poor
Read 33.6
Write 29.9
Mixed 27.4
38% 30.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.72
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.27
80% 1 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 18%
WDC WD10 EZEX-08M2NA0 1TB
649GB free, PID 2336
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
17.5% Very poor
Read 32.4
Write 29.7
Mixed 28.7
38% 30.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 2.04
4K Mixed 0.22
78% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.9% Poor
MC Read 8.5
MC Write 7.8
MC Mixed 7
22% 7.77 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 7.5
22% 7.57 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A88XM-D3H Builds (Compare 332 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-D3H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $163
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback