Sony VPCF23S1E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.31% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemSony VPCF23S1E  (all builds)
MotherboardSony VAIO
Memory9.1 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110722
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateAug 20 '20 at 11:52
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2670QM-$200
N/A, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
63.4% Good
Memory 77.9
1-Core 76.7
2-Core 147
60% 101 Pts
4-Core 268
8-Core 364
40% 316 Pts
64-Core 362
22% 362 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 540M
Sony(104D 9089) 2GB
CLim: 672 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
3.31% Terrible
Lighting 4.03
Reflection 4.85
Parallax 3.34
3% 4.07 fps
MRender 5.76
Gravity 4.13
Splatting 2.96
3% 4.28 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.31%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
TOSHIBA-TR200 480GB
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFA13.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 75 57 39 57 57 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
47.2% Average
Read 369
Write 242
Mixed 298
SusWrite 66.5
54% 244 MB/s
4K Read 13
4K Write 50
4K Mixed 18.3
70% 27.1 MB/s
DQ Read 259
DQ Write 59.5
DQ Mixed 10.7
46% 110 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
52.6% Above average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 19.7
MC Mixed 17.4
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 13.5
SC Mixed 13.9
40% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 84.5
47% 84.5 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VPCF23S1E Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Sony VPCF23S1E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $310
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback