Asus H87M-E

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	18.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H87M-E (all builds)
Memory	4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131030
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 19 '20 at 18:34
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	18%

PC Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium G3220-$36 19,337 User benchmarks, average bench 48% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	59.2% Above average	Memory 90.1 1-Core 88.4 2-Core 168 69% 116 Pts	4-Core 166 8-Core 172 22% 169 Pts	64-Core 171 11% 171 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 59.2% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Palit(1569 1380) 2GB CLim: 1359 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	18.7% Very poor	Lighting 23.4 Reflection 17.8 Parallax 21 19% 20.7 fps	MRender 26.4 Gravity 23.6 Splatting 17.7 18% 22.6 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 18.7% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 120GB 1,438 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 14GB free (System drive) Firmware: BB0Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 423 Write 401 Mixed 284 82% 369 MB/s	4K Read 38.9 4K Write 95.7 4K Mixed 50.2 174% 61.6 MB/s	DQ Read 374 DQ Write 326 DQ Mixed 170 176% 290 MB/s
Poor: 43% Great: 102%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53 237,241 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 315GB free Firmware: 023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 295 376 404 399 386 361 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	112% Outstanding	Read 443 Write 408 Mixed 395 SusWrite 370 91% 404 MB/s	4K Read 31.7 4K Write 103 4K Mixed 57 175% 63.8 MB/s	DQ Read 386 DQ Write 324 DQ Mixed 285 233% 332 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 125%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Value DDR3 1333 C9 2x4GB 549 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	46.4% Average	MC Read 14.8 MC Write 16.8 MC Mixed 15.1 44% 15.6 GB/s	SC Read 13.1 SC Write 16.3 SC Mixed 13.9 41% 14.4 GB/s	Latency 67 60% 67 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 46.4% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H87M-E Builds (Compare 860 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H87M-E - $129

CPU
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	197x
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	130x
Core i5-4440Intel $79Bench 61%, 81,111 samples	78x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	87x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	45x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	41x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	44x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	25x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	24x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	35x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	25x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $247

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $288	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16